Taylor Fritz vs Tatsuma Ito Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Fritz vs T. Ito

Taylor Fritz
USA
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
37
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
4
C. Rank
861
4
Best Rank
60
12
Total Titles
0
3
YTD Titles
0
$16.2M
Career Money
$790.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Tatsuma Ito
JPN
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
37
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
4
C. Rank
861
4
Best Rank
60
12
Total Titles
0
3
YTD Titles
0
$16.2M
Career Money
$790.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Fritz 1 - 0 Ito
They have played 3 sets in total, with Taylor Fritz winning 2 and Tatsuma Ito winning 1. The last match between Taylor Fritz and Tatsuma Ito was at the Le Gosier Challenger, 08-04-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Taylor Fritz getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fritz | 1 |
| Ito | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Le Gosier Challenger(04-08-16)
Taylor Fritz
6
6
6
Tatsuma Ito
7
4
4
T. Fritz vs T. Ito H2H Profile
T. Fritz vs T. Ito Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Taylor Fritz has won 47.06% of points on their second serve, while Tatsuma Ito has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Taylor Fritz, in recent form, has won 42.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tatsuma Ito has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Taylor Fritz has saved 57.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tatsuma Ito has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Taylor Fritz has won 70.51% of matches played (W/L 55/23), with Tatsuma Ito winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Taylor Fritz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 266/133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 72/52). Tatsuma Ito has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 360/278), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 33/35).
- Player level: In the last year, Taylor Fritz has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/8), where as Tatsuma Ito has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Taylor Fritz winning 1 times and Tatsuma Ito being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Taylor Fritz winning 2 and Tatsuma Ito winning 1.
- The last match between Taylor Fritz and Tatsuma Ito was at the Le Gosier Challenger, 08-04-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Taylor Fritz getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:31.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Taylor Fritz has played against opponents with an average rank of 51.49 while Tatsuma Ito has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Taylor Fritz has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tatsuma Ito has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Taylor Fritz has converted 27.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tatsuma Ito has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Taylor Fritz vs Tatsuma Ito Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Fritz vs T. Ito H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:9:31 | Average Match Time | 2:9:31 |
| 52% (49/95) | 1st Serve % | 57% (59/104) |
| 69% (34/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (32/59) |
| 48% (22/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (26/45) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 80% (4/5) |
| 44% (46/104) | Return Points Win % | 41% (39/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Fritz 55%, Ito 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fritz 52%, Ito 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fritz 65%, Ito 0%.
T. Fritz Recent Matches Played
T. Ito Recent Matches Played

T. Fritz vs T. Ito Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.65% (457/261) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.56% (556/427) |
| 60.38% (1114/731) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.75% (1268/1048) |
| 53.43% (9781/8525) | Games Win/Loss | 51.33% (11368/10778) |
| 66.67% (266/133) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.43% (360/278) |
| 58.06% (72/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.53% (33/35) |
| 58.18% (64/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (120/75) |
| 64.71% (55/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.44% (43/39) |
| 0.72 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 6416 | Aces Total | 2829 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1570 | Total Double Faults | 2148 |
| 1:39:53 | Average Match Time | 1:8:19 |
| 326.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 594.97 |
| 60% (32139/53520) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30538/50389) |
| 77% (24689/32139) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21289/30538) |
| 53% (11225/21379) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10018/19851) |
| 39% (1772/4586) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1999/4880) |
| 36% (19691/54124) | Return Points Win % | 39% (19774/51208) |
| 64.55% (71/39) | Slam W/L | 40.54% (30/44) |
| 60.48% (101/66) | Masters W/L | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 65.38% (17/9) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 61.80% (165/102) | Main Tour W/L | 47.18% (67/75) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 73.68% (70/25) | Challenger W/L | 58.22% (308/221) |
| 65.00% (26/14) | Futures W/L | 67.84% (135/64) |
| 64% (389/610) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (539/934) |
| 63% (65/104) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 28% (11/39) |
| 56% (206/369) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (189/351) |
| 56% (137/246) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (173/309) |
| 86% (440/379) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (550/469) |
| 14% (440/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (550/79) |
| 27% (278/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (433/86) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 AM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.25
W2
3.66
04:30 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.57
05:30 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.72
W2
2.11
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.71
W2
2.13
04:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.81
W2
1.92
01:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.6
W2
2.23
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Fritz (Rolex Paris Masters - Paris)
Fritz vs BublikCould play in The Third
Fritz vs PopyrinCould play in The Third
Fritz vs OpelkaCould play in The Third
Fritz vs MoutetCould play in The Third
Fritz vs AtmaneCould play in The Second
Fritz vs VukicCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
26 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Fokina Vs Fonseca H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Swiss Indoors Basel 2025?
26 Oct 2025
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Jesper De Jong Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Yannick Hanfmann vs Jacob Fearnley Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Joao Fonseca Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Damir Dzumhur vs Aleksandar Kovacevic Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Francisco Comesana vs David Goffin Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:00
H2H 3-2
13:00
H2H 3-1
16:30
H2H 1-2
17:30
H2H 2-1
13:00
H2H 1-1
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Trois-Rivieres
Canada
M25 Brisbane
Australia
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Qian Daohu
China
M25 Sintra
Portugal